SGNP: First monsoon visit of 2010

Trip Start Unknown
Trip End Ongoing

Loading Map
Map your own trip!
Map Options
Show trip route
Hide lines
Where I stayed
SGNP "Sanjay Gandhi National Park" "Borivili National Park" sanctuary Borivili Mumbai

Flag of India  , Maharashtra,
Tuesday, June 29, 2010

   As is to be expected, the forest has come alive with the onset of the monsoons.

 Carpets of green in various hues - new bamboo, grasses, leaves, vines and a small sampling of predominantly white coloured wildflowers can be seen throughout.

This year, the forest department has come out with new regulations.  Visitors may enjoy the Silondha and  other nature trails only in minimum group sizes of 10 people.  This is somewhat ridiculous considering that hordes of morning walkers traipse all over every part of the forest from 6am to 8am without any restrictions but those like us who want to enjoy a peaceful walk to observe the flora must now be forced to go in a noisy group.  The official manning the Nature Information Counter or Nature Interpretation Centre or whatever NIC is supposed to stand for, eventually said that we could go if we paid the fees for 10 people @ Rs 50 per head.  We felt Rs500 to be rather steep for 2 people, considering that it was not exactly wildflower season, so we opted instead to walk along the road to and from Kanheri.  Nothing wrong with this route except that there is too much vehicular traffic and hordes of noisy young picnic groups.  Disappointed, we went a little way along the unmanned trail leading to Jambul Mal but turned back after about 2km as the trail was intentionally blocked with bamboo.  Obviously the forest department did not want people here either and we were not in a mood to continue like "thieves".    There are a few smaller pathways going off the main tarred road and we followed these every now and then.   Some led to Adivasi shanties, some led to riverbanks.  Not the same as Silondha but not so bad either!

Slideshow Report as Spam
  • Your comment has been posted. Click here or reload this page to see it below.

  • You must enter a comment
  • You must enter your name
  • You must enter a valid name (" & < > \ / are not accepted).
  • Please enter your email address to receive notification
  • Please enter a valid email address


inadar on

Restricting the upper limit of a group size would have made more sense, but imposing a minimum group size is ridiculous! Anyway... loved the photos you clicked.

indianature on

Thanks Inadar. You are so right. I never thought of that.

I will be writing to the DCF about this and will incorporate your valid suggestion. Not that one expects any reply let alone even a positive outcome, but no harm in trying.

Use this image in your site

Copy and paste this html: