Everything is getting better - the new religion

Trip Start Jan 30, 2007
1
167
632
Trip End Dec 31, 2011


Loading Map
Map your own trip!
Map Options
Show trip route
Hide lines
shadow

Flag of China  ,
Thursday, September 4, 2008

Communist countries love stats. And they love manipulating them.
I think facts and figures look better than an overall assessment of something - right?
But any statistics coming out of China, I would take with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon, and a shot of white spirit. Why? China seems fixated on the growth and wealth mantra. It seems to be the sole purpose of everyone's existence.
Meet Chinese and the first thing they ask: how much do you earn.
No taboos here.
And while the figures show China is getting richer, it is against a low baseline, a self-inflicted injury they did to themselves - not the Japanese or any other Western imperialists.

How can an economist talk about quality of life? I would rather hear from a Buddhist monk or a Chinese migrant worker in Beijing or a family in a roadside shack.

An interesting issue of Newsweek recently ran a story which showed very clearly that China can't use 'we're a developing country' excuse anymore - whether it be for environment pollution and destruction - or for that matter - human rights.

My question is: if China is not a developing country anymore, why can't they take a lead on greenhouse emissions, pollution, etc? Why is it that they are taking as much new technology from the West, yet their cities are massively polluted? Why are they continuing to dig up and burn coal, even when it is destroying crops nearby and causing health problems?

China needs to step up and address these issues. Issues which will only get worse as time goes on, and, as their economy slows, these will rear their head, along with the growing gap between rich and poor, and the true costs of industrialisation.

That's my rant for today (in the back of my mind is the story from a friend about how a polluting concrete and fertilizer factory was continued to operate in her hometown, despite the health damage it was causing - people were presenting with cancers of the lungs. The factory had friends in government and paid taxes. Some of the townsfolk are now dead - long before their time.)





Chinese see dramatic rise in quality of life: economist
By Fu Jing (China Daily)


The impact of China's economic reforms in the last three decades has been as awe-inspiring, if not more, than the country's growth rate during the period, according to a leading international economist.

As a result of the Industrial Revolution, living standards (in Britain) increased by 50 to 75 percent in a lifetime (then only about 40 years), said former president of Harvard University, Lawrence Summers. At the current growth rate in China, living standards rise 100-fold, or 10,000 percent.

Between 1978 and 2007, China's real GDP grew annually at an average of 9.8 percent, increasing more than 13 times in real terms, while per capita GDP rose from 381 yuan to 15,973 yuan.

Budget revenue grew at an average annual rate of 13.45 percent, from 113.226 billion yuan to 5.13 trillion yuan, an increase of more than 700 percent after adjusting for inflation. Over the same period, United States' federal revenue only doubled in real terms.

China's fast economic growth has vastly improved the quality of life for its population. The enrollment rate of primary schoolchildren remained steady at nearly 100 percent between 2000 and 2005, and the gross enrollment rate in junior middle schools increased from 88.6 percent to 95 percent.

The life expectancy data from the World Health Organization show China's average life expectancy was 72.4 years in 2005, compared with the world average of 67. China's overall performance in virtually all health indicators, assessed by the United Nations, surpasses developing country averages by wide margins.

Since 1978, China has implemented a policy package to reduce poverty. Today the nation has 23 million poor people, down from 218 million in 1980.

Some 70 percent of farmers have been covered by a cooperative medical insurance network though they still have to shoulder at least half of the medical costs.

But Zheng Gongcheng, a professor with Renmin University of China, is worried about the gap between rural and urban regions, as income disparity has continued to widen.

China's Gini coefficient, an internationally accepted measure of income inequality, is estimated at 0.47. Anything more than 0.4 is considered "alarming". The coefficient was 0.3 in 1982 and 0.45 in 2002.

There are 21.48 million rural poor still facing food and clothing shortages, and there still are 35.5 million low-income earners. The poor account for 6 percent of the population in rural areas and 13.7 percent in the western regions. And the number for absolute poverty would be around 100 million if the World Bank parameter of $1 a day is taken into account.

The poorest of the poor live in harsh ecological conditions, mostly in remote areas, where natural resources are scarce and public services not widely accessible. They are also being more acutely affected by weather turbulences caused by climate change as half of China's arable land is often affected by natural disasters.

A member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, China's parliament, Zheng said the definition of decent livelihood itself has changed with the times. In the 1980s or '90s, being better off meant having ample food and clothing. Now it goes beyond that. "At least basic education should become a universal right."

Zheng said the leadership must understand there is much to be gained by pouring money into basic education and social security. "Social gains will come in the long run: we have made the poor potential human capital, and they will now contribute to society, making society more stable. We need to accelerate this process to realize social harmony."



http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2008-08/28/content_6977384.htm
Report as Spam
  • Your comment has been posted. Click here or reload this page to see it below.

  • Please enter a comment.
  • Please provide your name.
  • Please avoid using symbols in your name.
  • This name is a bit long. Please shorten it, or avoid special characters.
  • Please enter your email address to receive notification
  • Please enter a valid email address

Use this image in your site

Copy and paste this html: